![prodiscover basic report compared to ftk demo report prodiscover basic report compared to ftk demo report](https://badvin.org/etc/bv-basic-blur-sample.jpg)
- Prodiscover basic report compared to ftk demo report pro#
- Prodiscover basic report compared to ftk demo report software#
- Prodiscover basic report compared to ftk demo report windows#
ProDiscover IR allows you to push out an agent (which is client-server, NOT P2P) to the remote system, or deploy the agent via CD. "Borninfire says ProDiscover is not comparable to EE…" Also, I do not rely on EnScripts, and instead will write my own ProScripts (or external tools…both are included on the DVD with my book, BTW) because it's easier for me to do so. I find the interface much cleaner than EnCase, and I find it much easier to move around in ProDiscover. It's easier for me to use, and I've even gone so far as to convert EnCase evidence files to dd format so I could perform my analysis.
Prodiscover basic report compared to ftk demo report windows#
I use it all the time when analyzing Windows images. "Also, I think you commented out about ProDiscover in other topic I suppose, let me know more info about it." However, that's just data collection…it's up to you to actually analyze the data. From what I've seen of LiveWire, it appears to use some of the same volatile data collection tools I currently used (based on the output as it appears on the screen, formatting of the data, etc.). Instead, you have to have a toolbox and your own knowledge. I don't believe that any one tool can analyze malware for you. How is your view? Is it easy/usefull to analys Malware?" I'm interested in the company as the Malware investigation tool. "I just visit WetStone HP, and I notice that company say they are leading company to analys Malware and Steganography. I've listed some analysis steps in my book, but no two infrastructures are the same, so what may be legit in one organization may not be in another. LiveWire is good for capturing volatile data, but I don't know of any tool out there yet that performs analysis. "There are many people that say LiveWire is not good for "forensic analysis tool", and yor opinion is the same?" To conclude ProDiscover is not comparable to EE, but it is however comparable to EnCase Forensic. I personally haven't used it, but I look forward to a chance one day. I know alot of our peers in this community prefer it over EnCase. ProDiscover is still cheaper, and very capable compared to EnCase Forensic.
Prodiscover basic report compared to ftk demo report pro#
Pro Discover is more comparable to the EnCase Forensic product, because it is used for system by system analysis (generally 1 drive or array at a time) is examined, and it is a fraction of the cost.
![prodiscover basic report compared to ftk demo report prodiscover basic report compared to ftk demo report](https://blog.cloudflare.com/content/images/2015/04/members-1.png)
If you contact Kim Davis at Guidance PSD, she will explain more.
Prodiscover basic report compared to ftk demo report software#
The only vendor ive seen use EE is Guidance Software themselves, in the professional services division. Many in house counsel such as Dell are using EE in house, because it makes more sense than hiring a vendor to do a system by system physical acquisition 3 times a year, which is disruptive to the business physically and psychologically. To my knowledge, no vendors are using this app, because of the price. (i.e imaging 1000 workstations and analyzing the data) This is why Enterprise is so expensive, you can complete in hours what a physical system-by-system acquisition would take weeks. The EE system can deduplicate on acquire, comparing hashes of acquired files from one machine to another, and deliver detailed logs of what was acquired, what was skipped, and why, on what workstations. The EE administrator then does either a live content search, or searches for filenames on remote systems, and decides what to acquire and what to leave alone.
![prodiscover basic report compared to ftk demo report prodiscover basic report compared to ftk demo report](https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-FV_PMnRJNpU/UF4hR56v3qI/AAAAAAAAAYE/kMeixWQbVWs/s1600/Gr-9+-+IGCSE++Sample+Lab+Report-+Simple+Pendulum_002.png)
Once the backdoor is installed, it has the ability to send the content of a system (including deleted files) to the EE server, which is usually on site, or in some cases abroad. This process is generally performed by the sysadmin team, generally pushed out in a logon script etc. Really, EnCase Enterprise and ProDiscover are two completely different things, that accomplish the same primary goal.įirst of all, Enterprise (EE) works on a p2p system, which requires a small java servlet be installed on each acquirable system - which is basically a backdoor for the EE application.